This principle advocates truth-based steadfastness against expediency-driven negotiations with enemies. It distinguishes genuine resistance from imposed diplomacy and prevents repetition of past negotiation failures through historical awareness.
Authenticity of steadfastness based on truth against the imposition of any negotiation with enemies based on expediency
$ 2
The principle of Authenticity of steadfastness based on truth against the imposition of any negotiation with enemies based on expediency establishes a foundational approach to international relations. This framework distinguishes between truth-based resistance and expediency-driven negotiations in dealing with adversarial powers. It emphasizes maintaining principled positions against Western powers regardless of temporary political pressures or perceived short-term benefits. The approach learns from harmful past experiences like the JCPOA to prevent repeated diplomatic failures.
This methodology confronts the challenge of governments imposing wrong negotiation strategies on the political system. It addresses societal forgetfulness about historical negotiation failures and the passive role of revolutionary elites in discourse formation. The framework exposes the untrustworthy nature of Western powers beyond individual leaders or administrations. It strengthens collective memory about the pure damages resulting from previous expediency-based negotiations.
Core Implementation Programs:
-
Distinguishing between the Leader’s expedient and true positions in public discourse
-
Strengthening societal historical memory about negotiation damages
-
Reviving revolutionary elites’ role in resistance discourse formation
-
Exposing the invalid nature of Western agreements
-
Preventing wrong path imposition through social awareness
Authenticity of steadfastness based on truth against the imposition of any negotiation with enemies based on expediency prevents the misinterpretation of politically imposed decisions as the Leader’s genuine positions. It counters liberal narratives that promote negotiation as a solution to economic challenges. The approach maintains that the theory of resistance based on truth consistently outperforms expediency-based diplomacy. It ensures national sovereignty remains protected from Western infiltration through negotiated concessions.

Reviews
There are no reviews yet.